President Obama Must NOT Wait Until an Attack Before Getting Serious About the Islamic State

Share


Let’s state a fact. Some will say that it’s not a fact, but I’ll demonstrate why it is indeed a fact here shortly. The fact is this: if the United States continues with its current policy regarding the Islamic State, there will be a major terrorist attack on American soil perpetrated directly by the Islamic State or its supporters.

The obvious question would be how this can be construed as a fact. There are no indications that we’re any closer today than we were a couple of months ago to being attacked. The reason we can state it as factual is because the current policy regarding the Islamic State is no working and every day that they’re allowed to exist increases the chances of someone doing in America what they did in Paris, Beirut, the Russian passenger jet… or worse. It’s not a question of if but rather when it will be successful. With the FBI investigating 1,000 active potential Islamic State threats on United States soil, there’s no way to keep them all. Our law enforcement agencies are the best in the world but the numbers are stacked against them.

Some would say that the President will not do anything and therefore the best we can do is to wait for the next President to get into office. That’s not good enough. We’re over a year away from someone new in the White House and things are escalating with the Islamic State. It’s not just their military that needs to be eliminated. It’s their ideology. It’s the anger being felt by Muslims that are approaching the point of radicalization. It’s the risk of infiltration by the Islamic State among the Middle East refugees. It’s the tipping point that America and the world is reaching where the specter of terrorism is finding its way out of the dark corners and onto main street USA in some unsuspecting city.

There are those who say we should have been able to stop the 9/11 attacks based upon intelligence and the history of attacks that led up to the tragedy. They might be right, but if there’s one notion that should not be forgotten its that they had the unfortunate luxury of complacency. Today, we do not have that luxury. Even a decade and a half removed from 9/11, the risks are still present in the minds of law enforcement, politicians, and the general population. Add in the three major terrorist attacks in recent weeks and we should no longer allow any form of complacency.

Islamic State in America

Paris isn’t Beirut, and while it’s unfair to view the two through different filters, it’s clear that Paris is too similar to American cities to ignore. I’m personally very aware of the terrorism and radical Islamic ideology that kills people every day around the country, but I don’t fault the general population for viewing it from a different perspective. Paris is a shared perspective. If it can happen there, it can happen here.

Knowing this, there’s no excuse for waiting. There’s no reason that we should wait around for a terrorist attack to happen before acting to stop it. That’s not to say that nobody’s trying. It’s to say that the President of the United States is not trying hard enough. He has a history of underestimating the threat from the Islamic State and the American people are finally starting to realize the error in his ways. We must keep the pressure up, whatever pressure we have available to us, in order to bring the President to his senses. He’s clearly not seeing this straight. His judgment is clouded. Whether it’s by his lame duck status, his unearned Nobel Peace Prize, or by the hopes that nothing will happen until someone else takes over shouldn’t really matter. The reason is unimportant. The necessity for change is all that matters.

Even if the President gets more aggressive, an attack still might come. However, if he doesn’t change his policy, an attack will almost certainly come. We have to act which means he has to act. Otherwise, we’re playing directly into the hands of the Islamic State.

Soshable

Share

Until recently, you had to be a failure to be in trouble. Now, it’s enough for you to be weak

Share

To get a sense of what the tech landscape may look like if, as expected, the capital markets dry up next year, consider Angie’s List.

Angie’s List went public at $ 13 a share four years ago, rose as high as $ 28 a share in 2013 and fell as low as $ 4 a share last June. Earlier this week, the stock jumped as much as 13 percent back near $ 9 a share after IAC/InterActive Corp. (a company so good they named it twice) offered to buy it at a 12-percent premium to its market value at the time.

The board of Angie’s List politely said no. But investors signaled their thoughts on the proposed buyout by bidding up not only Angie’s List but also Yelp. The message was clear: In this tech market, there is no longer a rising tide lifting all boats. There are the strong, and there are the weak. And the strong are getting ready to eat the weak.

If you look back at the performance of technology companies in 2015, you can see a pretty definite bifurcation of the two groups. Many of the better-known consumer tech companies are faring poorly: Yelp is down 54 percent, Pandora 25 percent, Twitter 26 percent and Yahoo 34 percent.

Contrast that to the biggest consumer tech companies, those that have been able to deliver strong revenue and profit growth: Alphabet and Facebook are both up 40 percent, Microsoft is up 15 percent, Amazon is up 117 percent and Netflix is up 131 percent. Apple is up a more modest 5 percent, but remember that Apple had two pretty spectacular years in 2013 and 2014.

What’s happening is that investors are growing jittery at the thought that the Fed will start to raise interest rates later this year or early next year. They are switching from a bullish mindset to a defensive mindset, pulling money out of the weaker companies still trying to prove they can generate strong profit growth, and putting more into the ones that are doing just that.

Investors aren’t just placing bets on the likely winners, they are also helping to arm them with more capital and resources. When a tech company that pays workers in options or restricted stock units sees its stock price rally, it is better positioned to retain and hire the best talent in the industry. Conversely, a company with a sinking stock price could see a drain of their top talent.

A report this week from Bernstein Research, cited in Barron’s, underscored how stock performance affects the retention of engineers. Alphabet’s engineers are likely to leave when its stock is languishing, and vice versa. Yahoo’s talent pool has deteriorated in recent months as its stock declined.

The report concluded, “It is very hard to become a giant… and companies that do not become one of these large scale players (which some might call “platform companies”)… will be always subject to the competitive threat from the giants.”

A similar advantage exists in M&A as well. If Facebook, say, sees its stock appreciate while smaller public and private tech companies find their valuations diminishing, its stock will go that much further when used as a currency for acquisitions.

Most of the larger, successful tech companies also have tens of billions of dollars in cash, and are generating more each quarter. Much of this cash is overseas, to be sure, but if the economy slows you can count on many of them lobbying, as they did during the last recession, for a generous tax break to bring their overseas cash back to their US-based accounts. Some of that cash could go to fuel more acquisitions.

And as we’ve seen this past month, it’s not just the public companies that are having investors divide them into the strong and the weak, it’s the private ones as well. Uber, Xiaomi and Airbnb may have plenty of cash to carry them through a slowdown, but others aren’t so lucky.

Square’s IPO looks to price $ 2 billion below its last private round. Blackrock, which invested in a round that valued Dropbox at $ 10 billion in 2014, cut its estimate of Dropbox’s per-share valuation by 24 percent last month. Fidelity marked down its investment in Snapchat by a similar amount this week. Fortune discovered others, like Dataminr and AppNexus, that Fidelity marked down, as well as non-tech companies like Blue Bottle Coffee.

Smaller private companies that want to remain independent may have no choice but try to go public, especially if their venture backers want an exit sooner rather than later. But in down times, investors lose interest in companies that don’t have a proven record of profits. Atlassian, which filed for an IPO Monday, should have no problem on that count. Square, which is still losing money, will be an important test case for other IPO candidates in the red.

If IPO investors continue to grow choosier, an acquisition will be the be best remaining option for many companies needing new capital. But by then, the M&A market will be a buyer’s market, and companies are likely to be selective about targeting acquisitions that strengthen their own offerings. IAC, for example, sees Angie’s List as a strong fit with its HomeAdvisor business.

Angie’s List is profitable and far from a failure. But that’s my point. Until recently, you had to be a failure to be in trouble. Now, it’s enough for you to be weak. Angie’s List has had four years as a public company to improve on its subscription model but it never caught on at scale. Yelp’s reviews were free and had a deeper database of reviews.

Investors aren’t close to panicking, but they are moving away from faith-based investing. They want to see profits, and more than that, they want to see vitality: growth, yes, but a compelling story of why it will continue. The companies that can deliver may face some setbacks in a downturn, but they are positioned to grow stronger over time.

Those lacking vitality, however, might find themselves facing flow charts of choices like this: If there’s no more venture money, go public. If there’s no IPO demand, get bought. If there’s no acquirer interested, start cutting costs and hold on. As things are looking now, this is turning into a market that doesn’t favor the weak.

 …

SPONSORED: We handle the payments. You handle everything else. Learn more about Braintree.

Pando latest articles

Share