5 great ways to shatter employee engagement


More than 2 million people quit their job each month, and the No. 1 reason is the quality of the relationship they have with their direct supervisor.

It stands to reason, as managers are more likely to have daily interactions with employees, and they are usually the benchmark that employees use to judge a company’s culture.

However, only 32 percent of employees are truly engaged in their work, and we suspect it has something to do with these five manager behaviors that kill engagement:

1. They don’t recognize and reward employees.

A recent Interact/Harris Poll of 1,000 U.S. employees saw nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of respondents agree that not being recognized for achievements was a pressing concern in the workplace.

The most basic unspoken agreement in the workplace is this: The employee does good work, and management recognizes that work with sincerity and compassion, rewarding where appropriate. Managers simply can’t operate in a modern workplace anymore without this essential approach.

Before they can do valuable work, employees must first know they are valued. Currently, only 20 percent of them feel that way, and 35 percent consider it the biggest hindrance to their productivity.

2. They don’t communicate well, or at all.

It’s common sense: Managers who don’t set clear expectations get muddled results.

In a European Leaders study, 64 percent of the 2,000 full-time employees surveyed said their overall performance would improve if senior management communicated more effectively. Other studies have shown it’s a primary catalyst for morale issues among staff.

Without a strong grasp of the fundamentals of communication, managers are ill-equipped to motivate employees.

3. They don’t practice emotional intelligence.

Yelling at or berating an employee should not be a management tactic anymore.

Practicing emotional intelligence involves four key skills:

  1. Perceiving and expressing emotions;
  2. Understanding emotions;
  3. Using emotions; and,
  4. Managing emotions.

Many researchers believe proficiency in these skills is more important than overall IQ when it comes to individual success. When a manager can’t express his/her feelings in a professional manner, nor stay cool in the face of adversity for that matter, motivation and productivity might as well be off the table.

4. They micromanage.

More than half (59 percent) of employees have worked for a micromanager. Of those who have been micromanaged, 68 percent said it decreased morale, and 55 percent said it lowered productivity.

Micromanagers demotivate employees and create needless paranoia by acting as a controller of behavior instead of a leader of people. Some employees might thrive in that environment, but we’ve never met any. Most micromanagers do so out of a need for control that often has more to do with them than the performance of their employees.

To all those micromanagers out there: Stop it, please.

5. They don’t let employees pursue their passions.

Many employees—especially millennials—use their day job to primarily support a parallel career or personal passion of some kind.

Providing employees the opportunities and support to pursue their passions greatly improves their overall happiness and productivity. Yet many managers still feel the need to force employees to work within a little box, limiting their ambitions.

Encourage your staff to appear in and shoot their own videos. Learn how in this free guide.

As in any abusive relationship, they want the employee to believe that there is nowhere else to go and they should give up trying. Smart employees know better, and smart managers know that 65 percent of employees cite a lack of flexibility as a reason for quitting.

Caveat emptor

Having said all that, it’s important to note that frontline managers don’t have an envious position.

Sometimes called “America’s most neglected employee,” managers are notoriously undertrained and frequently go unrecognized for their contributions. A Root survey of 200 training executives reported that 83 percent of them had less than a quarter of their training budget set aside for manager training sustainment, but only 18 percent felt they were successful at it.

Furthermore, reducing overhead (57 percent) and making technology upgrades (48 percent) were more likely to be prioritized over investments in manager training.

Building better leaders

Experts cite the lack of well-trained managers as a main cause for the perennially low engagement levels that plague modern workplaces, but we don’t hang that jacket squarely on them.

The problem is systemic: For the whole feedback mechanism to work properly, managers need the same kind of motivation and support from senior leaders as they give to employees. All too often, organizations promote employees to management without the proper preparation and tools to succeed, and then they leave them to their own devices.

With a little thought and preparation, we can all learn to be better leaders of people.

A version of this article first appeared on the Michael C. Fina blog.(Image via)



Let’s shatter 2 myths about productivity sappers


“I see you hanging out by the coffee machine a lot—you must not have enough work to do.”

This comment, accompanied by raised eyebrows or a not-too-friendly tone of voice, probably sounds familiar to a lot of office workers. Many bosses feel that socializing at work is wasted time that decreases productivity. Ben Franklin would have agreed. “Lost time is never found,” he warned.

However, recent research shows just the opposite. It turns out that socializing at work increases productivity. In a Fast Company article, the results of research by MIT Professor Alex “Sandy” Pentland were reported. It turns out that when people in work groups talk to each other a lot (showing high engagement with each other, irrespective of the kind of work they do), they are more productive than groups that don’t interact as much.

Pentland cited research done at a Bank of America call center. He persuaded a manager at the facility to change the policy in the office allowing only one individual at a time to take a coffee break. When the bank allowed two people at a time to take a coffee break, the least-productive groups increased productivity by 20 percent.

A simple community building tactic that worked for a software company, according to Pentland’s research, was making the lunch tables in the cafeteria longer so that employees who didn’t know each other would have more interaction. That cost-free idea ended up increasing productivity by 5 percent. Pentland concluded that social time can account for a whopping 50 percent of improvements in communication.

However, community-building activities planned by managers, such as holding a beer night for employees after work once in a while, didn’t work to build productivity. Neither did meetings. Activities that were informal and spontaneous turned out to be the best for increasing the flow of communication, which in turn increased productivity.

Procrastination can be helpful

It’s noteworthy that in the same issue of Fast Company there was another article about the benefits of procrastination, another of Ben Franklin’s pet peeves. “Don’t put off to tomorrow what you can do today,” he said, and that has been passed down through generations of Americans. (It’s especially popular in New England, where I spent my teenage and college years).

According to business journalist Lydia Dishman, who wrote the article, procrastination is another counterintuitive way you can increase, not decrease, productivity. She experimented for a week with postponing work she knew she had to do to, “embracing procrastination,” as she put it.

[RELATED: Ragan’s distance-learning site houses the most comprehensive video training library for corporate communicators.]

Nothing terrible happened. No bolts of thunder from on high, no missed deadlines, no all-nighters. She put off deadlines until the last possible moment while letting herself lose focus on the work she had to do. She took walks to get away from the office, read, stared into space, spent time on social media, made personal phone calls, and took the opportunity to answer colleagues’ requests for help or information.

At the end of a workweek, she discovered two things: She got more done if she procrastinated, not less, and it’s not so easy to just ignore deadlines. Every time she allowed herself to take a break from the work at hand, she inevitably found herself going back to it afterward with more focus.

Dishman’s description of what happens when you try not to be distracted jibed with my own experience. She pointed out that when you’re working on an important task and you see an email fly in asking for help, you typically feel torn—you jump from the work to the email, start focusing on the email, then pull yourself back to the work again before dealing with the email.

This shifting back and forth—generally due to the guilty feeling that you have real work to do and can’t afford to spend time on email interruptions—can be more disruptive than just allowing yourself to take a break from the work to deal with the email, which doesn’t really sap your creative energy or take that much time away from your work.

She also commented that research shows that people who help others at work are happier. (One would assume that happier people are more productive at work.) The research, done by Professor Donald Moynihan at the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s LaFollette School of Public Affairs, showed that altruism at work “is not a form of martyrdom, but operates for many as part of a healthy psychological reward system.”

It’s not a waste of time

In conclusion, bosses should give some slack to employees who spend time socializing with one another, and the employees should be a little easier on themselves about putting off dealing with deadlines.

Because procrastination at work actually helps productivity, don’t feel guilty about the time you spent reading this article. As a matter of fact, feel free to take some time away from that important project you’re working on to chat up your office colleagues, all in the name of community-building communication and increased productivity.

A version of this article first appeared on the BridgeBuzz Blog. 

Popularity: This record has been viewed 58 times.
Ragan.com moderates comments and reserves the right to remove posts that are abusive or otherwise inappropriate.