Are we really better off becoming publishers?

Share

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes, 44 seconds

At some point over the next few months, Conde Nast is set to launch it’s own global Ecommerce business, cementing the trend that in luxury fashion the lines between being a publisher and being a retailer are increasingly blurred. This, too, can be seen on the other end of the spectrum with luxury retailers like Mr Porter and Net-a-Porter opting for a ‘content first’ approach in their site and have their own fashion magazines available both digitally and in print.

Retailers are becoming publishers and publishers are becoming retailers; is this a good thing symptomatic of the consumer centric shift or are we left with strategic mediocrity where nobody is really great at anything?

It’s hardly interesting that brands invest in content; but what I’m talking about here is retail brands where content is the focus. For example, Mr Porter leads with content, and drives users to content that is more broader lifestyle content rather than direct conversion/product focused.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 09.53.16

Mr Porter content is not purely fashion, brand or trend focused; like other luxury fashion retailers, but their content strategy is about encouraging readers to buy in to a certain lifestyle, with their products and promotions a backdrop to the editorial.

For other designer fashion retailers like Flannels or The Outnet, while visually they don’t look hugely different, their homepage edit’s drive users to more traditional product pages.

flannels

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 10.02.48

And while they still have strong editorial offerings, it’s clear that the primary focus is conversion.

So is being a publisher and leading with great content really the best SEO strategy?

Firstly I should probably call out the obvious; I don’t have analytics data, I recognise that this strategy may (or may not) drive additional value from a CRM, branding, sentiment, trust, awareness perspective and not everything is about how well a site performs in search engines or how successful the content is at earning links but who cares, it’s fun to have a look nonetheless.

Something I immediately noticed is that when content pages are typically those with the most authority, you’re likely to find editorial content ranking for transactional terms. For example, Mr Porter ranks 5th for the 50k monthly search volume query ‘Tom Ford’; good job, only, the page that is ranking is this long form interview with him whereas it’d probably be more lucrative for this optimised product page to be ranking for that query; and this page ranks for Paul Smith rather than the product page.

This happens fairly often, this article tends to rank for most suits and tuxedo queries; and if we think about intent, when someone explicitly queries ‘dinner suits’ or ‘dinner jackets’ they’re most likely in a purchase frame of mind and looking to compare various styles and in this instance, product pages would be better surfaced here.

This article ranks for people looking for classic parka jackets and this article ranks for gentlemen interested in stone chinos.

mr porter

I could be completely wrong and actually, these long form, content heavy article pages build trust and encourage users to click through to product pages to convert, but I doubt it. TL;DR, wanna buy shit.

From my perspective, product pages are what the user is really looking for (or used to?) when searching these kind of queries.

In terms of overall organic performance, it’s not obvious that content first results in better results.

designer fashion

Farfetch are the market leaders (well done, Matt!) and unlike Mr Porter; out of their 14,201 UK ranking pages within the top 100 that Linkdex Visibility picked up, 94% of them are product or category pages. Although editorial is a huge focus for them; they still lead with product rather than editorial. i.e – they are an ecommerce site first and foremost and use content to supplement that, rather than the other way round.

Another assumed benefit for investing hugely in editorial content is increased social shares, by the assumption that people are inherently more interested in content rather than products. But is this actually true? I think it depends, if you’re selling wheelie bins then sure, you’re likely to get more social traction from your articles of cute kittens dressed as wheelie bins than your product pages, but for luxury retail is the product page not interesting, aspirational and shareable in itself?

For net-a-porter, their product pages get significantly more shares than their magazine edits.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 11.34.24To date, the top performing product pages (comparing the same number of product pages and magazine edits) have generated 498% more Facebook shares, with Eres, Louboutin, Gucci and Givenchy being the favoured brands. And this makes sense, if you’re about to drop a grand on a pair of brogues, then the least you can do is brag about it.

Again though, this might be an unfair comparison, The Edit really isn’t optimised for social sharing, there’s no share buttons (aside from email) or no CTA to encourage readers to share the content. 

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 11.45.29

So what about links? Is it good at generating those? Well, out of all referring domains, the magazine accounts for 4% (excluding individual issues) and 2% of homepage anchor text specifically references ‘The Edit’ or ‘Magazine’.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 11.52.39

Likewise for Mr Porter’s top 10,000 pages; 6% of referring domains are pointing to journal content and 23% are to specific product pages. This surprised me, again with the assumption being that great content is the way to earn links; though again this is niche specific, for fashion naturally earned links tend to come from product reviews.

I know I’m short of multiple perspectives here; and although on the face of it, it seems as though for a luxury fashion brand positioning themselves first and foremost as fashion publishers makes sense, I’m reticent to agree it lives up to the hype.

Take a step towards marketing awesomeness and join 1,000s of others

Would you like to be an awesome marketer? Or would you rather know less? Become one of our elite members by joining in on our newsletter! Fill in your details below and start receiving high level knowledge now!

h

Kirsty Hulse is Head of SEO Best Practice at Linkdex and has six years experience defining search strategies for some of the world’s biggest brands, as well as small E-commerce start ups.

State of Digital

Share

Top 10 Media Publishers for September 2015: Instagram Trumps Facebook for Engagement

Share
shutterstock_314686367

In September, U.S. media publishers accounted for 1.4 billion total social actions (likes, comments, shares, retweets, favorites, dislikes), with 699 million from Instagram, 666 million actions from Facebook, 46 million from Twitter, and 13 million from YouTube (excluding views). This represents 22 percent of all actions taken on content published by brands in September. The media publishing industry saw a 5 percent decrease in total actions compared to August 2015.

Of the Top Ten, BuzzFeed Food saw the highest growth in engagement at 57 percent, jumping to number five in September from number ten in August 2015, driven by a 62 percent increase in likes, shares, and comments on Facebook. BuzzFeed Food also claimed the top spot on Facebook closely followed by BuzzFeed Video. Bleacher Report was the top media publisher on Twitter, and National Geographic kept its number one spot on Instagram.

Sept2015PubChart1

Key Engagement Drivers in September

BuzzFeed Food, BuzzFeed Video and Playboy saw the highest growth among the top ten, driven by an increase in social actions on Facebook. BuzzFeed Food increased post frequency by 97 percent on the platform, and, in particular, saw a 90 percent growth in actions on Facebook videos. Italian-inspired recipe videos dominated the media publisher’s most socially engaged Facebook posts, providing instructions on how to make various types of pizza and lasagna.

Facebook video recipes also drove BuzzFeed Video’s 12 percent growth in September, where the media publisher saw a 22 percent increase in social actions. Videos showing how to make various dishes like cheesy chicken, bacon-wrapped tater tots and alcoholic Oreos, led BuzzFeed Video’s top posts on Facebook.

Playboy’s social growth in September was due to a 14 percent growth in actions on Facebook. The top performing Facebook posts included a dig at the man-bun and comical memes and photos.

Sept2015PubChart2 

Fastest Growing Categories and Publishers

The fastest growing categories by total social engagement month over month were food (+15 percent), driven by BuzzFeed Food, science & technology (+6 percent), driven by CNET and The Verge, and Family (+4 percent), driven by American Baby and FamilyFun. WWD saw the highest growth of any media publisher in September at 158 percent.

Sept2015PubChart3 Sept2015PubChart3

Tania Yuki is founder and CEO of Shareablee, a leading provider of social content analytics for business. She has spent most of her career in digital marketing, measurement and analytics, and was recently honored with a Great Mind Award from the Advertising Research Foundation and featured in Fast Company and Forbes as one of 12 women driving digital in New York. 

Image courtesy of Shutterstock.

SocialTimes Feed

Share