8 ways toxic people poison the workplace

Oddly enough, the obviously terrible employees don’t cause the real problems.

Why? Whether clearly incompetent or capable but lazy, they’re easy to spot, so they’re easy to get rid of.

The real problems are caused by employees who appear to be doing a reasonable job but in fact are slowly destroying the performance, attitude and morale of the people around them.

What do they do?

1. They frequently say, “That’s not my job.”

The smaller the company, the more important it is that employees think on their feet, adapt quickly to shifting priorities and do whatever it takes—regardless of role or position—to get things done.

This is essential, even if a manager has to help load a truck or a machinist must clean up a solvent spill, even if the accounting staff has to hit the shop floor to help complete a rush order, even if the CEO must cover a customer service line during a product crisis.

Any task an employee is asked to do—as long as it isn’t unethical, immoral or illegal—is a task an employee should be willing to do. (Of course, great employees notice problems and jump in without being asked.)

Saying, “It’s not my job,” really says, “I only care about myself.” That attitude quickly destroys overall performance, because it turns a cohesive team into a dysfunctional batch of individuals.

2. They think they’ve already paid their dues.

You did great things last year, last month or even yesterday. We’re appreciative. We’re grateful.

Today is a new day. The only real measure of any employee’s value is the tangible contribution he or she makeseach and every day.

Saying, “I’ve paid my dues,” really says, “I no longer need to work very hard.”

Before you know it, other employees start to feel they’ve earned the right to coast, too.

[RELATED: Learn how to create an engaged and collaborative workforce at our employee communications summit!]

3. They feel experience is enough.

Experience is definitely important, but experience that doesn’t translate to better skills, stronger performance and greater achievement is worthless.

Experience that just is is a waste.

(Example: A colleague once said to us younger supervisors, “My main role is to be a resource for you.” Great—but then he sat in his office all day waiting for someone to drop by so he could cast his pearls of wisdom. Of course, none of us did. We were all busy thinking, “I respect your experience, but I wish your role was to do your job.”)

How many years you’ve served pales in comparison with how many things you’ve actually accomplished . Saying, “I have more experience” is like saying, “I don’t need to justify my decisions or actions.”

Experience (or position) should never win an argument. Wisdom, logic and judgment should win-in whomever those qualities are found.

4. They lead the ‘meeting after the meeting.’

You have an awesome meeting. Issues are raised. Concerns are shared. Decisions are made. Everyone in attendance says they fully support those decisions. Things are going to happen.

Then someone holds the “meeting after the meeting” to talk about issues he didn’t share with the group. Now—and only now—does he disagree with the decisions already made. Sometimes he even says to his team, “Look, I think this is a terrible idea, but we’ve been told to do it, so we have to do it.”

And what was supposed to happen never will.

Waiting until after a meeting to say, “I’m not going to support that,” is like saying, “I’ll agree to anything- but that doesn’t mean I’ll actually do it. Shoot, I might even work against it.”

Those people should work somewhere else.

5. They love to gossip.

Before a meeting, we were talking about supervisors in another department when our new boss looked up and said, “Stop. From now on we will never say anything negative about anyone unless they are actually in the room. Period.”

Until then I had never thought of gossip as a part of a company’s culture—gossip just “was.” We all did it.

If an employee has talked to someone about something Martha is doing, wouldn’t everyone be better off if he stepped up and actually talked to Martha about what she’s doing? If it’s “not his place” to talk to Martha, it’s definitely not his place to talk about Martha.

Saying, “Did you hear what he did?” is like saying, “I have nothing better to do than talk about other people.” Not only do employees who gossip waste time better spent on productive conversations, they also cause other people to respect their co-workers a little less—and anything that diminishes the dignity or respect of any employee should never be tolerated.

6. They use peer pressure to hold other people back.

The new employee works hard. She works long. She’s hitting targets and exceeding expectations. She rocks. Eventually she hears, from a more “experienced” employee, “You’re working too hard, and you’re making the rest of us look bad.”

Where comparisons are concerned, a great employee doesn’t compare herself against others; she compares herself against herself. She wants to “win” that comparison by doing better today than she did yesterday.

Poor employees don’t want to do more; they want others to do less. They don’t want to “win.” They just want others to make sure they don’t lose.

Saying, “You’re working too hard” is like saying, “No one should work hard because I don’t want to work hard.”

Pretty soon very few people do-and the ones who keep trying get shunned for a quality we want every employee to have.

7. They hurry to grab the glory.

OK, maybe he did do nearly all the work. Maybe he did overcome almost every obstacle. Maybe, without him, that high-performance team would have been anything but.

Probably not, though; nothing important is ever accomplished alone—even if some people love to act that way.

A good team player shares the glory. He credits others. He praises. He appreciates. He lets other people shine.

That’s especially true for an employee in a leadership position-he celebrates the accomplishments of others, secure in the knowledge that their success reflects well on him as well.

Saying, “I did all the work” or, “It was all my idea” is like saying, “The world revolves around me, and I need everyone to know it.”

Even if others don’t adopt the same philosophy, they resent having to fight for recognition that is rightfully theirs.

8. They throw others under the bus.

A vendor complains. A customer feels shortchanged. A co-worker gets mad. No matter what has happened, it’s someone else’s fault.

Sometimes, whatever the issue and regardless of who is actually at fault, some people step in and take the hit. They willingly accept the criticism or abuse because they know they can handle it (and they know that maybe the person actually at fault cannot).

Few acts are more selfless than taking the undeserved hit; few acts better cement a relationship.

Few acts are more selfish than saying, “It wasn’t me…” especially when, at least in part, it really was.

Saying, “I had nothing to do with that, so you’ll have to talk to Martha,” is like saying, “We’re not all in this together.”

At the best companies everyone is in it together. Anyone who isn’t on board should go.

A version of this article first appeared on LinkedIn.(Image via)

Popularity: This record has been viewed 2102 times.
Ragan.com moderates comments and reserves the right to remove posts that are abusive or otherwise inappropriate.



Trolls Poison the Comment Well For Everyone



Internet trolling is a hobby for some and a way of life for others. A recent paper from University of Manitoba found that Internet trolls really do troll just for the lulz. Those trolls who responded to the survey scored consistently high in terms of sadism, narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism — also known as the Dark Tetrad. So is it worth trying to fight against the trolls, or maintaining comments at all?

Trolling is generally distinct from cyber-bullying or genuine arguments online. According to the research, the purpose of as trolling isn’t to target one individual or play devil’s advocate. The only reason to troll is to sow discord in a comments section and to invoke fury from the other participants. Trolls are doing what they do entirely for personal satisfaction.

Survey participants were asked a series of questions and split into five groups: Non-commenters, debaters, chatters, trolls and other. By analyzing their answers in this framework researchers were able to gauge the qualities of each group. Trolls ranked significantly higher in Dark Tetrad traits. The more time spent commenting online, the more like these traits were to increase.

Trolls still remain a minority at less than six percent of Internet users surveyed. More than 40 percent of users surveyed fell into the non-commenter bracket, which is an even better indication that comments sections all over the Internet are not filled with voices of reason. If a little more than two-in-five of your readers aren’t commenting at all, why maintain a comments section?

Popular Science shut down its comments section in September 2013, citing the fact that troll comments can have a negative impact on the perception of otherwise perfectly good content as the reason. And Google has been trying to clean up YouTube comments by insisting that users comment through Google+ infrastructure.

As trolls have a negative impact on content, page and site admins have to continually weigh the benefits of maintain comment sections.  “Because the behaviors are intrinsically motivating for sadists, comment moderators will likely have a difficult time curbing trolling with punishments” said a University of Manitoba researcher in an email to Slate.

Image credit: Bludgeoner86

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.