Are eBooks Beneficial Or Detrimental For Toddlers?

Share

Reading to your child is well known to be beneficial for his or her development. With the rise of eBooks, many parents now use their tablets for bedtime stories. However, many parents wonder whether there is a difference between reading to a child using a traditional book or using a tablet. Many studies have shown too much screen time is detrimental to a toddler’s mental development. However, parents wonder whether eBooks count as screen time, since using a tablet is technically a screen but the action is reading. It is a difficult argument that continues to range with sound arguments on both sides and no official answer yet.

The Benefits Of eBooks For Toddlers

Over the past few years, numerous tablets have hit the market, including the Samsung NOOK. Tablets have become popular because they provide a combination of eReader and laptop computer that is easy to take with you anywhere. Many consumers have found using a tablet an easier way to amass a library without using up the physical space.

Additionally, with many public libraries offering digital services, parents can bring their children plenty of books to read without having to spend money. With the rise of this technology, many eBook publishers have created books that also have video and audio options integrated into the books, especially for children. Some programs on tablets also can help a child learn to read without a parent having to supervise. This has the capability to further enhance a child’s reading skills, but many experts wonder if it might actually be detrimental.

Advertisement




Studies Reveal eBooks Can Harm Children’s Learning

Recently, some studies have found that eBooks may be worse for children than print books. One study was from the UK’s National Literacy Trust. It stated that kids reading digital books had poorer reading skills than those reading paper books. Other studies have also found that reading from an eBook led to poorer reading comprehension skills in the child. The study, and others, believed that it was due to the children focusing on the device more than on the story, unlike when they read with a print book and interact with the pages. Additionally, parents also did not talk as much with their children as when reading print books. Print books tend to enhance dialogic reading, which creates a back and forth dialogue of the story that enhances linguistic development.

The Problem With The Studies

Although experts performed the surveys and studies, there were some limitations to their studies. According to Digital Book World, one of the main limitations of these studies includes the causality of the survey. It did not answer whether eReaders were the cause of the poorer literacy rates in the National Literacy Trust survey or whether higher skilled readers chose print over digital when reading. Additionally, many children’s eBooks are not strictly books anymore. They have additions to the books, including video and audio, which add interactivity to the book. This alters how parents, and children, interact with the books. These enhancements also can help children to learn and enhance their linguistic skills.

The Detriments Of Screen Time

According to the New York Times, the American Academy of Pediatrics advises parents to read to children beginning at birth and not exposing them to screens prior to the age of 2 and limit the time after that to less than two hours a day. Parents become confused about the combination of these two protocols when reading to their children with tablets.

Several studies have found that screen time is detrimental to a toddler’s development. Screen time in these studies typically focuses on television, computers, and video games, not on reading digital books. There is a limited amount of research on eBooks and children because of the newness of the devices. However, some studies have found that interactive apps have helped toddlers to pick up language faster than apps that have no action.

A Lasting Debate

Many experts still do not know what to recommend to parents about whether or not to read eBooks to toddlers, and time and additional research is needed to discover a firm recommendation. However, eBooks do not strictly constitute as screen time, so they can be beneficial for the linguistic and brain development of children. The eBooks can play a valuable role in educating children, as long as they are supplemented with traditional books and learning as well. Parents should remain wary about using tablets too often for entertaining or teaching their children, even with reading.

To get the most out of reading an eBook to your child, try to read it in the same way you would a traditional print book. Do not let the tablet or app do all the work, even if it as an interactive app. Talk to your child and discuss the book in ways that also incorporates your real life. This discussion-based reading will help to enhance your child’s linguistic skills, no matter the platform of the text.

Reading eBooks To Children Header

Reading eBooks To Children

IMAGES: [CHRISTOPHER FURLONG / GETTY IMAGES] [BABBLE]

Bit Rebels

Share

Detrimental SEO Myths Still Plaguing Online Businesses

Share

Detrimental SEO Myths Still Plaguing Online Businesses image search engine optimization 411104 1280

In the realm of SEO it’s especially true that certain older tactics and strategies are no longer effective – and in some cases may get you penalized. However, the depletion rate of total SEO tactics and strategies is nowhere near the growth rate of new things to try. That said, there are some myths about SEO worth dispelling.

Here are a few SEO myths still influencing site owners today to their own detriment:

Keyword density is important. To do SEO well, you really only need to worry about keywords and meta tags. The more focus on keywords, the better.

Keyword focus has always been a very important aspect of SEO. You do need to understand what people are searching for to better optimize your website and user experience. SEO’s used to be able to gain organic rankings fairly easily with low-quality content as long as the keyword density was “good”. But the landscape has almost completely changed. For one thing, Google’s algorithm has evolved and continuous updates paint the picture for where this machine is going in terms of understanding content quality. In other words, low-quality content production is becoming less effective daily.

Second, there’s more competition in general – specifically competition focusing on their own SEO strategies. Worrying too much about keywords and keyword density can disrupt the quality of your website’s user experience. When this happens, users lose trust and there’s enough competition in almost every arena for you to lose business. It’s still important to provide Google signals indicating what your content is about, and using keywords in specific areas on-page can both increase rankings and reinforce the end user’s search. But creating low-quality, keyword–specific content is not a sound strategy moving forward.

Related Resources from B2C
» Free Webcast: Using Data and Design to Create a Knockout Email Nurture Program

XML sitemaps are not important. Google has all my pages indexed so it’s not important to maintain an XML sitemap.

Years ago it was actually considered best practice to notify Google through a web form every time you created a new page. This would signal their bot to crawl your page and index the content. One way to facilitate this process was to generate and submit an XML sitemap with all your URLs. Some SEOs believed this would help them rank for a larger variety of keywords in the shortest amount time because Google could now see all the URLs from a single source.

Today we have social media and RSS feeds and people automatically linking to everything else through CMS’s. Google and Bing don’t need you to tell them you have new content in order to find it, crawl it and index it. However, it’s still important to build and maintain an XML sitemap and utilize Google Webmaster Tools and Bing Webmaster Tools. It’s your way to keep a dialog (of sorts) going with the search engines about the overall health of your website. They’ll notify you if they find errors with your pages and you can respond by correcting the errors and resubmitting pages. It shows the search engines you are committed to improving your website and the user experience as well as the experience of the search engines. This will certainly help optimize your site overall, and that will help you improve your rankings.

Content syndication is a valuable link building tactic: It’s worth your energy to syndicate content with backlinks as long as the ratio of unique content is higher than what’s duplicate.

There’s a lot of debate about this but I’m not aware of any exact ratio of unique content that can save you from the duplicate content filter. What I can say is that a link building strategy based on this tactic is flawed. First off, most legitimate publishers will not want to publish syndicated content and if it’s your intention, as it should be, to foster a high quality backlink profile – one that can contribute to brand and traffic value – you’re not going to want to partake in a lot of content syndication with low quality publishers. The best syndicated content is that which happens naturally. If you put your energy into creating the right kind of content that resonates with your target market and is worth sharing and syndicating, then that job will be done for you. It’ll get picked up on its own by quality publishers. And yes, you absolutely can and should use PR and social to nudge your top content along.

Content syndication is appealing because it takes a lot of time and resources to write quality unique content all the time. Here’s what you can do:

  • Bolster your previously published content with links from the new content you and your colleagues create.
  • Get with your team and literally map out a web of all the places you and your brand write content for and get published at.
  • Where are the opportunities to connect individual pieces together with links that improve the user experience?
  • What are the top performing articles? Think about your most important business metrics – engagement metrics, performance metrics, conversion metrics.
  • Determine how to get more like-minded traffic to those top pages.

There’s a good chance you can squeeze additional life out of the content you’ve already produced and this is a better use of time than trying to republish half-unique content on questionable publications that may or may not ever see any traffic.

Content strategy is a luxury. Nobody reads online so I really only need content for SEO purposes.

I don’t think I’ve heard someone say something more ignorant and arrogant than this, yet I continue to hear it all the time.

If this were in fact true, Google would not exist. In fact, commerce as we know it would cease to exist. People do in fact read, watch and absorb content, content, and more content now more than ever. It’s the backbone to all marketing and commerce activity. It’s the reason anybody purchases anything. As interest increases, so too does the desire to fully understand products and services. It’s what keeps people coming back. It builds brand loyalty. Content strategy is critical for optimizing the purchase funnel now more than ever. Increased competition is one reason, but also search engines demand unique content and even today really only crawl and truly understand text-based content. To agree with this myth is to cripple business efforts and limit your ability to engage with connected consumers who drive conversations and revenue.

Unfortunately SEO myths abound. It’s likely because the trade is shrouded in complexity, especially around the subject of link building. To avoid these and other SEO and link building myths with your online business, always consult with an expert.


Social Articles | Business 2 Community

Share