There are three food delivery companies that might not be completely fucked:
Blue Apron: Leader of the way too crowded meal kit space, valued at $ 2b
Munchery: Leader of the prepared space, valued at $ 300m
Postmates: Leader of the food delivery space, valued at over $ 400m.
I’ve always been a fan of Postmates. I use it at least twice a week. Paul and I have spent months testing Blue Apron and its many (way too many) derivatives. Munchery I have never used, even though someone very thoughtfully gave me a gift certificate a few weeks ago when I wound up in the hospital with pneumonia. There’s a reason it’s worth a fraction of Blue Apron. There’s something vaguely cafeteria about having prepared food delivered to me that isn’t from a restaurant I know and love.
Before spending months reviewing all the “non-demand” food services, I would have scoffed at Munchery’s news yesterday that it’s also going to take on the meal kit space, directly competing with BlueApron. Great, because the world – and the ad space in my Facebook feed – needs yet another of these totally undifferentiated services.
But oddly enough the move mimics the latest conclusion from our last few weeks of tests –which pitted reigning champ Blue Apron against Gobble and Sun Basket.
That conclusion: The only hope for any of these companies to survive and get big enough to go public is to Voltron up and create a player who can collectively solve the dinner problem, depending on your needs and desires and for God’s sake do it in a flexible way that can be customized on any given week…
Net neutrality concerns led several of Internet.org’s partners in India — including travel e-commerce group Cleartrip, TV news outlet NDTV, media startup Newshunt and the country’s largest English-language newspaper, The Times of India — to pull out or cut back on their content offerings
Zuckerberg insisted in a Facebook post that Internet.org’s mission to connect the world can coexist with net neutrality, writing:
We fully support net neutrality. We want to keep the Internet open. Net neutrality ensures that network operators don’t discriminate by limiting access to services you want to use. It’s an essential part of the open Internet, and we are fully committed to it.
But net neutrality is not in conflict with working to get more people connected. These two principles — universal connectivity and net neutrality — can and must coexist.
To give more people access to the Internet, it is useful to offer some service for free. If someone can’t afford to pay for connectivity, it is always better to have some access than none at all.
Internet.org doesn’t block or throttle any other services or create fast lanes — and it never will. We’re open for all mobile operators, and we’re not stopping anyone from joining. We want as many Internet providers to join so as many people as possible can be connected.
Arguments about net neutrality shouldn’t be used to prevent the most disadvantaged people in society from gaining access or to deprive people of opportunity. Eliminating programs that bring more people online won’t increase social inclusion or close the digital divide. It will only deprive all of us of the ideas and contributions of the two-thirds of the world who are not connected.
Meanwhile, Internet.org continued to add to the list of countries where its app is available, as Zuckerberg announced its launch in Indonesia in another Facebook post, writing:
We just launched Internet.org in Indonesia! It’s one more step toward connecting the whole world.
Last year, I had the opportunity to travel to Indonesia to support our efforts to connect more people. During my trip, I visited Taman Kampoeng Cyber, a “cyber village” in Yogyakarta. It’s a community that came together and organized to get connected to the Internet.
I stopped and talked to the owners of some of the shops, and it was inspiring to see how being connected was helping people share their talents and ideas with the world. The photo (above) is of me talking to a clothing store owner who was using his Facebook page to share new T-shirt designs.
After today, everyone in Indonesia will have the opportunity to share in the benefits of the Internet and access free services in areas like jobs, health, education and communication on the Indosat network.
Through this effort, we will lower the cost of accessing the Internet and raise awareness of the Internet’s value. And we’re going to continue rolling out Internet.org in more and more countries so that one day everyone can share the opportunities of a connected world.
Readers: What are your thoughts on Internet.org and its mission?
Over the past week in India, there has been a lot written about Internet.org and net neutrality. I’d like to share my…