The SEO Dangers of Wikipedia and Reputation Management

Share
The SEO Dangers of Wikipedia and Reputation Management

The SEO Dangers of Wikipedia and Reputation Management

comments

Suppressing content with Wikipedia is one of the worse things you can do.

When people contact me wanting to create a Wikipedia for reputation management, I give them one piece of advice…….RUN!

Of all the people who contact me to create a Wikipedia page, there are a few that do so for reputation management purposes. This is one of the worse things that you can do if your goal is to push negative content down the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages). While it may seem like an easy way to suppress negative content, it can have negative consequences that will not only cause you frustration, but destroy any reputation management efforts that you have already undertaken.

I previously wrote about this subject for AllBusiness Experts a few years ago, but I still receive many contacts from people wanting to use Wikipedia for reputation management. My advice to anyone wanting to create a page for this reason is to run as far away as you can.

“Wikipedia can actually harm your reputation management efforts. Despite appearing on page one of Google, it will cause negative information to appear right along with it.”

What is the ultimate goal of reputation management?

Reputation management has two purposes.

The first is to maintain a good reputation on the Internet. This is done by monitoring search results and publishing as much positive information as you possibly can. Saturating the SERPs with positive press will help you create and maintain a positive image. Protima Tiwary had a great post on Social Media Week back in August that explained ways to maintain your personal brand

The second way to use reputation management (and unfortunately the most common), is to drown out negative information that is showing up in the search results. To do this, you need to strategically create positive press in order to push the negative information to page two of Google and beyond.

The difference between the two is simple. The first is to create and maintain a positive reputation “before” anything bad happens, while the second is a way to help get rid of negative information “after” something bad happens. While the ultimate goals are different, the way you get there is the same (populate the search results with positive press).

People who have done research on reputation management often start right off with trying to create a Wikipedia page. If you have a positive reputation, then creating a Wikipedia page is not going to be an issue. However, many people try to create a page in an effort to push negative content off the first page. This is a bad decision and one that cost them dearly in the end.

Why Wikipedia?

Let’s go beyond the statistics of Wikipedia for a moment. Forget about how it is the 7th most visited website in the world and how popular it is to readers. Focus on its relationship with Google.

“Google gives phenomenal weight to Wikipedia. If there is a page related to the search term, expect to see it on page one.”

Here’s how it works:

A Wikipedia page is created, automatically indexing with Google sometimes within hours of creation. The page will populate the search results for the keyword (or keyword phrase) associated with the content.

Another thing Wikipedia will do is give weight to the links used within the article. You will see many services selling links to Wikipedia (I do NOT recommend buying Wikipedia links – I discontinued doing so a while ago).

A link from Wikipedia can do wonders for your website, which is why this next part you really need to pay attention to.

Negative articles and the Wikipedia slingshot effect.

As stated above, Google gives heavy weight to links from Wikipedia. Once your article is posted, people are going to see it and eventually add information to it. This includes the negative information that you are trying to keep out. The negative press that you have worked so hard to push down (and paid so much money to a reputation management company) will begin to rise again in the SERPs.

Since the negative information is linked from Wikipedia, Google will give it heavier weight and start to bring it back to the top. So, links to your negative press are going to basically slingshot higher on the back of the Wikipedia page. This is the opposite of what you want.

Once the Wikipedia slingshot effect kicks in, you are going to regret every thinking about creating a Wikipedia page.

But can’t I control which articles are used in the Wikipedia page?

Absolutely. In the beginning!

“Wikipedia is open source and anyone can edit. This means that although you may create a Wikipedia page with all the information you want, it is subject to review and change by anyone editing the site. What you initially write can and will be changed.”

Wikipedia has editorial guidelines that must be followed. Although you may create a page with all the positive links about you (leaving out the negative), someone is ultimately going to come along and add them. This is how Wikipedia is designed to work.

Once someone adds the negative press, the Wikipedia slingshot effect will kick in, bringing those negative pages back to the top of Google.

What can be done once this happens?

I would like to give you good news, but at this point you are beyond getting things back to where they were. Deletion of the Wikipedia page is the best option as it will remove all the links once the page is deleted. However, if the page is notable, the likelihood of it being deleted are slim.

In fact, if the page was not notable, it would have likely been recommended for deletion already instead of people adding content to it. If you are unsure of what constitutes notability, I offer a free guide that will help you better understand the process.

Alternative reputation management techniques.

Reputation management is nothing new. You can find dozens of techniques that will likely help you suppress content in the search results. Some of my favorites include articles written by journalists and website building. Not all methods work the same for each person so obtain a thorough evaluation of your online reputation prior to jumping into using any method.

Hopefully you are reading this prior to creating a Wikipedia page. Deciding to create a Wikipedia page is a decision you should discuss with your reputation management company first. If you are simply maintaining your positive reputation, then a Wikipedia page can be a good thing. However, suppressing content with Wikipedia can be a nightmare if trying to restore your reputation.

Social Media Week

Share

Season 4, Episode 10: The Hidden Dangers of Sitting [Podcast]

Share

4 Stats that Will Motivate You to Stand Up

Welcome to Season 4, Episode 10 of the This Is Your Life podcast. Stu McLaren is filling in for my regular cohost Michele Cushatt. In this episode, we discuss the hidden dangers of sitting.

season-4-episode-10-v1-artwork

Modern Americans are the most sedentary people in the world—ever. Between our beds and our seats, we’re on our feet only a few hours each day. The bad news is that it’s killing us. Here are four stats that will motivate you to spend more time standing—starting today.

Listen to the Audio

MICHAEL HYATT WITH STU MCLAREN
S04E010 – The Hidden Dangers of Sitting
Play Episode

Click here for more. Or, better yet, subscribe via email and get my full posts delivered to your inbox. It’s fast, free, and more convenient.

How to Launch a Self-Hosted WordPress Blog in 20 Minutes or Less
 
Discover How to Publish a Book and Launch Your Bestseller


Michael Hyatt’s Intentional Leadership

Share