Bad pitches are flawed in some major way. The releases are addressed to the wrong person, have nothing to do with the subject the journalists or bloggers cover, or are downright rude.
Some PR people are just terrible at their jobs. They fire off identical, unpersonalized emails based off huge distribution lists or email databases. They fail to explain why their client would make for a good story.
These are PR spammers, and they’re the bane of journalists’ existence. As a PR professional, you must steer clear of this frustration at all costs. How can PR professionals avoid that label while also gaining the coverage they want for their clients? Read on…
Target the right places
Don’t waste time pitching to the wrong publication. Remember, quality is more important than quantity. Sending out 1,000 identical pitches to every blogger you could find an email address for won’t guarantee coverage. Sending out 10 well-crafted, focused pitches just might.
The most important thing to do is find publications that are related to the client you’re pitching. For instance, if you have a client who sells car parts, you probably don’t want to pitch a piece about that client to a women’s fashion and beauty website unless you have an incredibly unique angle.
Instead, research publications that are read by your client’s target demographic, likely men ages 25-54, and then take the time to read over those sites, magazines, and newspapers before you make your pitch.
Tailor every pitch
Mention a specific section that you think this story would fit in; it shows that you are familiar with the publication and took the time to customize your ideas. This increases the likelihood that a journalist will take you seriously.
For instance, a friend promoting this infographic about sports injuries might target sites like Deadspin or Bleacher Report, which cover sports. She might also consider sending her pitch to a site like The Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog, targeting the Law & Lawyers page with a very specific spin for a post on this infographic. In some ways, the most obvious places to pitch might not be the best ones; they might already be inundated with similar stories.
Get the names right
Nothing turns off a journalist faster than getting a pitch addressed to “Mark” when his name is “John”—or, worse yet, getting a pitch addressed to the name of a competitor. Usually those pitches are moved straight to the trash. Double-check both the spelling of the names and the titles of the people you are pitching before hitting send.
Some PR professionals take an aggressive approach when pitching a story. This can be OK as long as you remember to mind your manners. Calling someone who chooses not to jump on your story “stupid,” “an idiot,” or “not good at your job” will not endear yourself to this person nor gain coverage. (Think those examples sound extreme? Nope. This happens a lot.)
You don’t have to become best friends with the journalists you pitch. You don’t even have to kiss up to them, contrary to popular belief, but being civil and polite goes a long way toward getting a civil and polite response back.
Don’t resend your pitch over and over
Many PR people make the mistake of following up repeatedly on a pitch that has received no response. The assumption is that your piece deserves coverage, so the person you’re pitching must have missed it the first time if you haven’t heard back.
Follow the “one and done” rule. If you haven’t heard back in three or four days, sent a (polite) follow-up note asking again about coverage and recapping the major points of your original email. If you don’t hear back again this time, take the hint: The writer’s just not that into you, or not interested in the topic you’re pitching.
It’s simple, really: if you don’t want to be labeled a spammer, be respectful, and don’t use spammy tactics. Follow these tips and you should start hearing back from the places where you want coverage. Ignore them at your peril—no one wants to be labeled a PR spammer.
Popularity: This record has been viewed 346 times.
Ragan.com moderates comments and reserves the right to remove posts that are abusive or otherwise inappropriate.